Famed choreographer Valerie Preston-Dunlop described it as something that “emerges by the way movements are put together so that they grow out of each other.” ![]() Walter Laird, who is often thought of as the founder of modern Latin dancing, said “Rhythm is a regular occurrence of accented beats in a bar of music,” a simple explanation that speaks only to the music itself rather than the dance technique used. ![]() I don’t believe you can have musicality if you don’t have rhythm, because you must be able to hear the music before you can respond to it, and rhythm is the foundation of response to music. When we see it we recognize it and everybody tends to agree it is there. It is somewhat subjective in the sense that we donʼt all agree on what it is and whether it is there when only some qualities in this area are present, but it seems very objective when musicality in the dancing is very good. Jesper Fredricksen, who is in the process of writing a book on musicality, defines it as “a quality describing the dance performance, not the dancer and not the choreography.” He says that musicality in dancing is very abstract for most people. Here’s some insight from what others have said around the world. It seems that most are in agreement that rhythm and musicality are different, but there are big variations in how the two are defined. I was looking at several articles on this subject, including comments by some of the world’s best dance coaches and top champions. ![]() We often refer to people, even people who don’t know how to dance, as “having rhythm.” But in ballroom dancing teachers are always talking about “musicality.” What’s the difference, or are they the same thing?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |